yolov5

Дерево: 16206692f2

Автор	SHA1	Сообщение	Дата
Glenn Jocher	6f5d6fcdaa	Robust objectness loss balancing (#2256 )	3 лет назад
Glenn Jocher	bdd88e1ed7	YOLOv5 Segmentation Dataloader Updates (#2188 ) * Update C3 module * Update C3 module * Update C3 module * Update C3 module * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * updates * updates * updates * updates * updates * updates * updates * updates * updates * updates * update * update * update * update * updates * updates * updates * updates * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update datasets * update * update * update * update attempt_downlaod() * merge * merge * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * parameterize eps * comments * gs-multiple * update * max_nms implemented * Create one_cycle() function * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * GitHub API rate limit fix * update * ComputeLoss * ComputeLoss * ComputeLoss * ComputeLoss * ComputeLoss * ComputeLoss * ComputeLoss * ComputeLoss * ComputeLoss * ComputeLoss * ComputeLoss * astuple * epochs * update * update * ComputeLoss() * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * merge * merge * merge * merge * update * update * update * update * commit=tag == tags[-1] * Update cudnn.benchmark * update * update * update * updates * updates * updates * updates * updates * updates * updates * update * update * update * update * update * mosaic9 * update * update * update * update * update * update * institute cache versioning * only display on existing cache * reverse cache exists booleans	3 лет назад
Glenn Jocher	86897e3663	Update train.py test batch_size (#2148 ) * Update train.py * Update loss.py	3 лет назад
Glenn Jocher	ca9babb8e6	Add ComputeLoss() class (#1950 )	3 лет назад
Glenn Jocher	6ab589583c	Add colorstr() (#1887 ) * Add colorful() * update * newline fix * add git description * --always * update loss scaling * update loss scaling 2 * rename to colorstr()	3 лет назад
Glenn Jocher	69be8e738f	YOLOv5 v4.0 Release (#1837 ) * Update C3 module * Update C3 module * Update C3 module * Update C3 module * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * updates * updates * updates * updates * updates * updates * updates * updates * updates * updates * update * update * update * update * updates * updates * updates * updates * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update datasets * update * update * update * update attempt_downlaod() * merge * merge * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * parameterize eps * comments * gs-multiple * update * max_nms implemented * Create one_cycle() function * update * update * update * update * update * update * update * update study.png * update study.png * Update datasets.py	3 лет назад
Glenn Jocher	8bc0027afc	Update loss criteria constructor (#1711 )	3 лет назад
yxNONG	b3ceffb513	Add QFocalLoss() (#1482 ) * Update loss.py implement the quality focal loss which is a more general case of focal loss more detail in https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.04388 In the obj loss (or the case cls loss with label smooth), the targets is no long barely be 0 or 1 (can be 0.7), in this case, the normal focal loss is not work accurately quality focal loss in behave the same as focal loss when the target is equal to 0 or 1, and work accurately when targets in (0, 1) example: targets: tensor([[0.6225, 0.0000, 0.0000], [0.9000, 0.0000, 0.0000], [1.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000]]) ___________________________ pred_prob: tensor([[0.6225, 0.2689, 0.1192], [0.7773, 0.5000, 0.2227], [0.8176, 0.8808, 0.1978]]) ____________________________ focal_loss tensor([[0.0937, 0.0328, 0.0039], [0.0166, 0.1838, 0.0199], [0.0039, 1.3186, 0.0145]]) ______________ qfocal_loss tensor([[7.5373e-08, 3.2768e-02, 3.9179e-03], [4.8601e-03, 1.8380e-01, 1.9857e-02], [3.9233e-03, 1.3186e+00, 1.4545e-02]]) we can see that targets[0][0] = 0.6255 is almost the same as pred_prob[0][0] = 0.6225, the targets[1][0] = 0.9 is greater then pred_prob[1][0] = 0.7773 by 0.1227 however, the focal loss[0][0] = 0.0937 larger then focal loss[1][0] = 0.0166 (which against the purpose of focal loss) for the quality focal loss , it implement the case of targets not equal to 0 or 1 * Update loss.py	4 лет назад
Glenn Jocher	fe341fa44d	Utils reorganization (#1392 ) * Utils reorganization * Add new utils files * cleanup * simplify * reduce datasets.py * remove evolve.sh * loadWebcam cleanup	4 лет назад

9 коммитов (16206692f245e713a5beb380de6dc4bed944986c)